Spinach vs Kale: Nutrition, Calories & Best Choice

Complete spinach vs kale nutrition breakdown with 0 kcal per 100g, glycemic index, and diet compatibility.

Written by Victura Nutrition TeamReviewed by Victura Editorial ReviewLast updated Aug 8, 2026

Spinach vs Kale: food photo
Spinach vs Kale: — real food photo
Spinach portion size visual
Portion size
Spinach calories and macros infographic
Calories & macros

Quick answer

A 100g serving of spinach vs kale provides about 0 kcal. Per 100g you get about 0g carbs and 0g protein.

Spinach vs Kale is a whole food with approximately — calories per 100g, tracked in Victura for macro-aware meal logging.

Calories (100g serving)
0 kcal
Carbs (100g)
0.0g
Protein (100g)
0.0g
Serving reference
100g · 100g serving

Scientific Nutrition Profile & Comparative Analysis

Research-backed

When comparing spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica), we look at two of the most nutrient-dense leafy greens available. According to USDA FoodData Central, raw spinach provides approximately 23 calories per 100g, consisting of 2.9g of protein, 0.4g of fat, 3.6g of carbohydrates, and 2.2g of dietary fiber. In contrast, raw kale is more energy-dense, delivering 49 calories per 100g, with 4.3g of protein, 0.9g of fat, 8.8g of carbohydrates, and 3.6g of dietary fiber. While both greens are exceptional additions to a health-conscious diet, their micronutrient profiles and bioactive compounds present distinct physiological advantages. Spinach is a premier source of non-heme iron, providing 2.71mg per 100g, and is exceptionally rich in folate (Vitamin B9) and phylloquinone (Vitamin K1), which supports blood coagulation and bone mineralization. However, spinach contains high levels of oxalic acid (oxalates). Oxalic acid binds to minerals like calcium and iron in the digestive tract, forming insoluble precipitates that significantly reduce their bioavailability. Consequently, while spinach contains calcium, only a small fraction is absorbed by the body. Cooking spinach can help reduce soluble oxalate content, thereby improving mineral absorption. Kale, a member of the cruciferous (Brassicaceae) family, excels in its concentration of Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and beta-carotene (a Vitamin A precursor), providing 241mcg RAE of Vitamin A per 100g. Unlike spinach, kale is extremely low in oxalates. This means the 150mg of calcium present in 100g of kale has a much higher fractional absorption rate, making kale a superior plant-based source of bioavailable calcium. Furthermore, kale contains glucosinolates, which are sulfur-containing compounds that hydrolyze into isothiocyanates (such as sulforaphane) during mastication and digestion. Peer-reviewed studies in toxicology and oncology suggest these compounds support phase II detoxification enzymes and exhibit anti-inflammatory properties. Both greens are rich in carotenoid antioxidants, specifically lutein and zeaxanthin, which accumulate in the macula of the human eye and protect against light-induced oxidative damage. From a glycemic perspective, both greens have an estimated glycemic index (GI) of 15, representing a negligible impact on blood glucose levels. Choosing between them often depends on specific metabolic goals: spinach offers a lower-calorie, iron-rich profile that is highly versatile, while kale provides superior fiber, bioavailable calcium, and cruciferous-specific phytonutrients.

Community Insights & Practical Culinary Applications

Community insight

Within the Victura community meal logs, spinach and kale serve distinct culinary and lifestyle roles. Spinach is highly favored by users seeking a seamless, mild-tasting nutrient boost. Because of its high water content and thin cell walls, raw spinach blends effortlessly into post-workout protein shakes without altering the texture or introducing bitter notes. It is also a favorite for quick sautéing, shrinking down rapidly to accompany eggs or whole grains. Users tracking strict macronutrient targets appreciate that they can consume a high volume of spinach with minimal impact on their daily carbohydrate or caloric limits. Conversely, kale is celebrated for its structural integrity and satiety-inducing properties. Victura users frequently log massaged kale salads as meal-prep staples. Massaging kale with a small amount of healthy fat, such as olive oil or avocado, helps break down its tough lignified fiber walls, making it significantly easier to chew and digest. Baked kale chips are also a popular low-calorie, high-fiber alternative to processed potato chips. Some users with sensitive digestive systems note in their logs that raw kale can occasionally cause mild bloating or gas due to its complex carbohydrates and fiber structure. For these individuals, lightly steaming or sautéing kale improves gastrointestinal comfort while preserving the majority of its heat-stable micronutrients.

References

  1. USDA FoodData Central - Spinach, raw(usda)
  2. USDA FoodData Central - Kale, raw(usda)
  3. Oxalate content of foods and its effect on calcium bioavailability(scientific)

Frequently asked questions

Spinach is significantly lower in calories, containing 23 kcal per 100g compared to kale's 49 kcal. Kale contains more than double the fiber (3.6g vs 2.2g) and slightly more protein (4.3g vs 2.9g) per 100g serving. This makes spinach ideal for strict calorie-controlled diets, while kale is excellent for increasing dietary fiber intake.

People also ask

  • How do spinach and kale compare in calories and macronutrients?

    Spinach is significantly lower in calories, containing 23 kcal per 100g compared to kale's 49 kcal. Kale contains more than double the fiber (3.6g vs 2.2g) and slightly more protein (4.3g vs 2.9g) per 100g serving. This makes spinach ideal for strict calorie-controlled diets, while kale is excellent for increasing dietary fiber intake.

  • Which green leafy vegetable is better for weight loss?

    Both are exceptional for weight loss, but they work differently. Spinach has a lower energy density, allowing you to eat larger physical volumes for very few calories. Kale, however, has a higher fiber content which slows gastric emptying and promotes longer-lasting satiety, helping to curb appetite later in the day.

  • Are spinach and kale suitable for a ketogenic diet?

    Yes, both are highly compatible with a keto diet. Spinach is particularly advantageous for strict keto because it contains only 1.4g of net carbohydrates per 100g. Kale contains approximately 5.2g of net carbohydrates per 100g, meaning it can easily fit into a keto lifestyle but requires more mindful portion tracking to stay within daily carb limits.

  • What is the glycemic index of these leafy greens?

    Both spinach and kale have an estimated glycemic index (GI) of 15, which is considered very low. Because of their high fiber and minimal digestible carbohydrate content, neither green causes a significant rise in blood glucose or insulin levels, making them excellent choices for metabolic health.

  • How do oxalates in spinach compare to kale, and why does it matter?

    Spinach is high in oxalates, organic compounds that bind to minerals like calcium and iron, reducing their absorption in the gut and potentially contributing to kidney stones in susceptible individuals. Kale is a low-oxalate cruciferous vegetable, meaning its calcium content is highly bioavailable and much more readily absorbed by the body.

How we review this guide

Written by
Victura Nutrition Team
Reviewed by
Victura Editorial Review
Reference sources
4
Last updated
Aug 8, 2026

Revision & correction policy

Ready to track your meals with AI?

Victura scans your plate, logs macros automatically, and coaches you toward your goals — halal, keto, diabetic-friendly, and more.